Comments on: ProForm Treadmill Reviews 2024: Tested, Rated, Ranked https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/proform-treadmill-reviews/ Expert Home Gym & Treadmill Reviews Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:03:17 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kristen Nelson https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/proform-treadmill-reviews/#comment-15275 Wed, 03 Feb 2021 16:37:39 +0000 https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/?p=8354#comment-15275 In reply to Morey.

Morey,

Both the Pro 9000 and NT 1750 are good machines. They just have a few different specs. The 1750 has a bit more power and higher incline, but it only has a 10″ touchscreen. The Pro 9000 has a slightly smaller motor and incline but a new 22″ touchscreen. It really comes down to which features you need/prefer. They’re both good treadmills so you can’t go wrong with either one.

]]>
By: Morey https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/proform-treadmill-reviews/#comment-15264 Wed, 03 Feb 2021 01:27:25 +0000 https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/?p=8354#comment-15264 In reply to Kristen Nelson.

I am researching treadmills and have liked your reviews and information. This being the case, with the addition of the 22″ screen on this now, what would be the downside in going with this one over the 1750? Yes there is a slight difference in the CHP motor 3.75/3.6 and they have reduced the incline to 12% but is there anything else I may not be taking into account, especially if they are shipping this one for free over the $199 for the 1750?

]]>
By: Kristen Nelson https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/proform-treadmill-reviews/#comment-15145 Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:23:20 +0000 https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/?p=8354#comment-15145 In reply to Emily.

Emily,

The new 2021 model has a 22″ touchscreen.

]]>
By: Emily https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/proform-treadmill-reviews/#comment-15138 Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:28:45 +0000 https://www.treadmillreviewguru.com/?p=8354#comment-15138 The ProForm website shows the Pro 9000 as having a 22” touchscreen, but your review says it’s actually 10”, which I’ve seen on other reviews as well. Can you confirm which is correct?

]]>